|
|
|
| Interviews@3LC - Design | |
| Sunday, 29 July 2007 | |
|
Interview with Joost van Bleiswijk
I met Joost in Venice when I met his partner, Kiki van Eijk. He was sent by the Gallery owner to fetch me from the ‘main drag’ of Cannaregio, but nobody told me they were sending him. I walked right past a tall blonde with sunglasses on, talking on his cell phone, and didn’t even make the connection til later, when Kiki asked “So you already met Joost?”. Joost is a Design Academy Eindhoven graduate, class of 2000. After graduation, he and Kiki opened a studio space together in Eindhoven (right up the street from Maarten Baas). Although they work quite closely, each designs in a distinctively different style. In contrast to the delicate work of Kiki, Joost’s work is very strong in character, focused on contours and immediate object recognition, almost essential forms which nonetheless give the idea of greatness. It only took one internship, with Studio Job, to confirm his idea that in design, you must follow your own ideas regardless of what others might say. So it was out with the Baroque and in with the iconography. In a respectful nod to the distant past which has so inspired his designs, Joost is mindful to include old world workmanship in his pieces as well. He follows a “no screw no glue” philosophy to build his limited edition designs, and is able therefore to offer an additional dimension of value to his collection. (Above: Francis Lefebvre, Kiki van Eijk, Joost van Bleiswijk outside the design-e-space Gallery (owned by Lefebvre) in Venice)
For
yesterday, I think the Dutch have a long history with art that started in the
17th century and a lot of wealth – where do you invest that wealth?
– so a lot of art comes from that time. The
today and tomorrow, a lot of Dutch have an autonomous approach to design and
the self-producing part is the most important.
There’s no label which dictates what you’re supposed to do. You only produce what you think is beautiful
without someone telling you what to change.
A lot of Dutch have their own workshops, so basically if you can make it
yourself, your product can exist. I think Dutch design continues to stay popular
because the Dutch spend a lot of time on the promotion of their work, since
it’s self-produced they have to promote the work because nobody will do it for
them. That’s why we go to Milan, Japan, etc. Holland is very small, so you need to go
abroad to make a living.
Design Academy Eindhoven seems to be the place for cultivating design talent. Describe your experience there and what it
was like among so much promising talent—did it in some way push you harder to
be around so many talented people? How
would you compare it to the other learning institutions you’ve had a chance to
visit? Of course you see some talent differences, but you’re around so many talented people striving to make talented things. After graduation though, it’s different, it’s who will stand out, who will produce more. For us, it was just a school with very hard work, a lot of work, and you just do it. You don’t see the fruits of it while you’re there. The learning environments at the other places I’ve been, like academies and institutes, are much smaller, and I think that’s less inspiring and less competitive. In a lot of other countries, I think the Design departments are part of a bigger University, so you’re very task oriented and you become good at solving problems, but it’s not a creative approach to design. At DAE you’re taught that you have your creativity like an artist, but you don’t have your canvas, you have a 3D object you want to design. You have a personal approach, you don’t care about the technical part, that will be solved in the end by others. You’re not stopped by all those demands in a product. You’re still a student. You learn and develop your ideas, that’s the most improtant thing. And after that you can execute it, but that’s not the main goal at the Academy.
At DAE,
there are a couple hundred people who all want to be the “next design star” and
they’re all competing, and it’s not always that nice. When we moved out of DAE housing (an old
Monastery) and the new students came in, already you could really see the
difference. The first year students were
wearing Prada shoes and paying attention to their personal aspect as if that
contributed to becoming a designer. (Above: Image of high chair and Kiki Rose Lace carpet in design-e-space Gallery. The chair is from a special edition of 3, plated in nickel and made for the gallery. The difficulty and expense of plating in nickel makes these pieces even more valuable and exceptional than those in Joost's stainless steel limited edition set.)
I’ve heard other designers say that being able
to make things yourself is a distinguishing factor in successful designers, not
just in bringing the product to market, but also in the development.
Well, if
you can finally make a connection between the technical aspect and the
manufacturing, then it’s even more interesting.
But it’s not taught at the Academy.
It’s true that the people who can do that, you know find the producer or
make the contacts with the producer, those are the ones whose work you see in
magazines. (Below: Outlines project)
You work
very closely with Kiki, yet your styles are quite different. Her business card has gold accents, yours has
silver…In the end, what’s the difference between how a woman designs and how a
man designs. Can you see it?
Sometimes, actually
a lot of times I think I can see the difference. Of course there are exceptions, but it’s just
the feel, I don’t know. I think it’s
just the feeling. The total feel you get
from an object that’s mainly nowadays.
If you go back to 18th century furniture you really couldn’t
tell, because the style isn’t so individual.
Nowadays you just sense it. It’s
like women themselves!!!
(laughter). It’s not only about
technical or organic, because there are male designers who do that stuff too,
it’s the starting point of design. Men
see the big picture and women seem to focus on the detail, the skin of a
design, things like that. I think men
are more into the general looks of a thing, and then the details follows. For women, I think detail is a starting
point. But I don’t want to generalize
for all designers. For me, I start with
the contours of a design and slowly add the details. For Kiki, it’s more the detailing which is
the starting point of the design.
Is your
proximity to Kiki reflected in your work, or has your style remained
uncontaminated?
I think I
have been affected by Kiki, and she has been affected by me. When we started after DAE, we started
building up a workshop ourselves. I am
handy with woodworking and I could figure it out. That helped Kiki with getting her things in
the world. I think that Kiki can get
scared from conceiving how to make something, and I don’t perceive those same
issues as stumbling blocks, and I can help her in that. On the other side, the business aspect and
approach toward design has changed in my work thanks to her. After you work together, you start looking at
the same stuff and you start to like to the same stuff. Last year we were at the V&A and we saw
that we liked the same things—she looks to the details, and I look to the
detours, but in the end we liked the same objects. (Above: Little
clock, 25 x 19 x 37 cm, Polished stainless steel)
I’m
interested in archetypes, and especially archetypes of classic objects, objects
that have been there for hundreds of years, like a standing clock, high chair,
hourglass, objects with history and a conclusion in their shapes. Although there are a lot of different shapes,
you recognize the contours of the object, which are very strong. You can see that in my Outlines project, I wanted to grab the look. They are conclusions in and of
themselves. I want to make my own
overview and conclusion to all of those “conclusions” so I create my version of
that archetype. By using the “no screw
no glue” construction, you get very linear and recognizable shapes. It’s a sort of re-creation of classic
pieces. What a lot of people do now is
they take a baroque style element and they exaggerate a detail in a strong new
way, but I don’t care for those Baroque shapes and curves, I care more about
the general feel of the object. I was taking
my first theory course and thought I could take this style and add any curve to
the legs of a table. Should I go along
with this Baroque thing?? But I decided
I needed to go with my own feeling and keep it pure, and that way it becomes
more timeless, more sober. You don’t really
recreate a piece, you give more your opinion than your version. (Above: Chess-game,
Limited edition of 8 + 2 ap, 64 x 64 x 24 cm, The board comes with the 32
chess-pieces in polished stainless steel sand-blasted stainless. Contains the incredible amount of over 680
separate elements)
What did
you learn about design when you were interning at Studio Job?
I learned
that you should work autonomously and not care about what other people
think. I learned to go my own way, be as
personal as possible. Business wise, Job
always said it’s more interesting to sell one big piece than a thousand little
objects. I agree with him, now that I’ve
been working on my own. A little object
that’s being produced by a label is kind of like a poster of an art piece, like
a catalogue that you buy. But to own the
real thing, that’s the one big piece, that’s the real deal. (Below: Joost and Big-heavy-cabinet,
Limited edition of 8 + 2 ap, 228 x 44 x 226 cm, Polished stainless steel)
What’s
your biggest complaint about the design industry today? Is there anything you’d like to see more
of? Less of?
Mainly
less. Less of everything. Less stuff.
No fashion design industry, please.
Not every year a complete new collection. Of course we’re a built guilty of the same,
but it’s not a large collection every year.
I don’t like the fact that design is becoming more fashion like—“this
year, BLUE is big, so paint your house blue.”
Or Autumn, woodcarving is big.
Rapid changing of interiors, I don’t like. You can see that in our designs, we don’t
care about trends.
So then you don’t like my website.
(Laughter). I can understand it and why you do it that
way! People like new stuff. But I think the biggest trend should be that there’s
no trend. You shouldn’t force people by
giving them new ideas, like new new new. You should do like an overview—this is new
and it’s sustainable. I used to compare
it to the old days. When someone needed
something, they went to the cabinetmaker and said ‘make me this’. The wealthy could afford something
extravagant, but the less wealthy just got something simple, but it was to last
a lifetime. I prefer that you buy
something you really like because you fall in love with it, not because it’s a
trend or you need it. I’m a guitar player,
and it’s the same for musical instruments.
If you buy a good guitar, you keep it for life.
You and Kiki said that you keep an eye out on
Jaime Hayon, you really like his work.
What is it about a piece that speaks to you first? What does it have to have to make an instant
positive impact with you?
About
Jaime, it’s that he makes objects that are little characters. He takes a vase but doesn’t think of it as a
vase. He makes it into an alien or
something. In general, I look at
contours. That’s why I hate the modern
car industry because all the contours are the same. An object should have personality. I like pieces that are made of wood or metal,
or sometimes plastics, it doesn’t matter, as long as it’s unique. (Below: Vases in polished stainless steel, varying heights. Three one-off pieces in stainless steel, available also silver plated outside and gold plated inside by a craftsman near Venice.)
Which three items would you put in a time
capsule today that say the most about you and the times we live in.
A good
cooking pan, a garden in general, and a little beach retreat house. A wood cabin.
The pan
because I like good food and spending time preparing it. It’s a nice thing to do, and it really tells
something about yourself, whether you care about yourself, if you like the good
things in life. A garden
because people need space. You can’t
stack people 20 stories high on top of each other, you need air to breathe, or
a huge balcony could do. You need solid
ground under your feet for a late night fire or relaxing. The wood
cabin, because to go explore you don’t need much, you just need simple housing
and that’s it. When we go on holidays,
we really like tree huts, beach huts, poorly made shacks. You can do that anywhere in the world and
it’s nice.
What motivates you?
What
food/dessert best describes your design style?
What was it five years ago? What
would you like for it to be in five years?
The
first thing you notice in a restaurant? The way the
waiters are dressed tells a lot. So, if
you walk in and see they just have black suits, the typical penguin style, then
you know it’s very classic, fake-chic. There’s
a nice place in Berlin and where you’re served by drag queens, and I
think it tells a lot about the place.
You should go there, it’s really a nice restaurant.
One food you can never say no to?
Most important room in the home?
The best color for a front door?
Favorite flea market find.
Biggest
celebrity crush?
You’ll
always pick up a magazine if _____________________ is on the cover?
Favorite
place to people watch.
Which
aspect of a foreign culture intrigues you most?
One
thing you always bring with you when you travel.
|
|
| < Prev |
|---|
Interviews
